Bev the sea turtle is back.
Bev was among a group of sea turtles found on a beach along the Gulf of Mexico last year. According to an article in today's Florida Times-Union, Bev and the others suffered from an illness that prevented them from opening their jaws. Many of the turtles died, but Bev was kept alive by being hand-fed tiny bits of fish at a marine park in Panama City.
Because she was unable to eat normally, it was though that Bev would remain in captivity. Then someone suggested she be sent to the Georgia Sea Turtle Center on Jekyll Island.
The GSTC staff worked with Bev, providing physical and behavioral therapy until she could fully open her mouth and eat on her own. Fitted with a radio tracking transmitter, she was returned to the wild in November, from Panama Beach.
Due to genetic differences between Gulf Coast turtles and those found along the Atlantic, scientists believed Bev would remain in the Gulf. Satellite transmissions showed that to be the case.
Then she 'fell off the radar,' so to speak.
When Bev's signal was detected again, she was found to be swimming off Florida's east coast, heading north with the Gulf Stream. When she reached colder water around the South Carolina border, she headed south again -- right back to Jekyll Island.
Bill Irwin, director of the Sea Turtle Center, says this was completely unexpected and highly unusual. Some scientists think she may have nested previously on Jekyll Island. Irwin says that may be true, given that Bev is behaving that way. They'll know for sure if she shows up on the Jekyll Island beach later this year.
In the meantime, Irwin and his staff will 'keep an eye' on Bev and she meanders about in the marsh behind Jekyll.
Stay tuned.
-- JB
Learn more about the Georgia Sea Turtle Center on Jekyll Island.
Showing posts with label Jekyll. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jekyll. Show all posts
Friday, April 18, 2008
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
What's Good for the Goose ...
I've been waiting for the other shoe to drop, and it seems that it has.
The Jekyll Island Authority has opened the door to discussion of whether private homeowner leases should continue. According to an article in this morning's Georgia Times-Union, JIA will consider the issue of whether to extend resident leases beyond 2049. The State of Georgia extended the Authority's lease in 2007; however, the JIA has not made a decision about whether it will extend private homeowners' leases similarly.
Jekyll Island homeowners and hotel operators* have an interesting situation, in that they own the structure itself (the "bricks and mortar") but NOT the land. They lease the property from JIA, which administers the island for the state. In other words, they are at the mercy of decisions made by the Authority.
The discussion was begun at Monday's Authority meeting, by Finance Committee Chairman Bob Kreuger. He was inspired, the article notes, by Sen. Jeff Chapman who sponsored a bill during the recent legislative session, banning construction of any new permanent residences on the island.
Residents are claiming retaliation. Others suggest they should have seen it coming, given their outspoken role in challenging new development on the island. They won the beach. Now they're making noises about challenging alternate plans.
That's their right, of course, and they should stand up for what they believe in. At the same time, though, they might want to carefully consider their battles. Like it or not, new development is probably going to take place on Jekyll Island.
Sometimes you can have it both ways.
Stay tuned.
JB
The Jekyll Island Authority has opened the door to discussion of whether private homeowner leases should continue. According to an article in this morning's Georgia Times-Union, JIA will consider the issue of whether to extend resident leases beyond 2049. The State of Georgia extended the Authority's lease in 2007; however, the JIA has not made a decision about whether it will extend private homeowners' leases similarly.
Jekyll Island homeowners and hotel operators* have an interesting situation, in that they own the structure itself (the "bricks and mortar") but NOT the land. They lease the property from JIA, which administers the island for the state. In other words, they are at the mercy of decisions made by the Authority.
The discussion was begun at Monday's Authority meeting, by Finance Committee Chairman Bob Kreuger. He was inspired, the article notes, by Sen. Jeff Chapman who sponsored a bill during the recent legislative session, banning construction of any new permanent residences on the island.
Residents are claiming retaliation. Others suggest they should have seen it coming, given their outspoken role in challenging new development on the island. They won the beach. Now they're making noises about challenging alternate plans.
That's their right, of course, and they should stand up for what they believe in. At the same time, though, they might want to carefully consider their battles. Like it or not, new development is probably going to take place on Jekyll Island.
Sometimes you can have it both ways.
Stay tuned.
JB
* The exception is the Jekyll Island Club Hotel. As part of the National Historic Landmark District, the main clubhouse and other historic hotel structures are owned by the state and leased to the hotel operators.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)